4.7 Article

Technical Note: Sequential ensemble data assimilation in convergent and divergent systems

期刊

HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 3319-3329

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/hess-25-3319-2021

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [RO 1080/12-1, BA 6635/1-1]
  2. Heidelberg Graduate School of Mathematical and Computational Methods for the Sciences, University of Heidelberg [GSC 220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the characteristics of divergent and convergent geophysical systems in relation to data assimilation methods, showing that a sufficient divergent component is necessary for proper application of sequential ensemble data assimilation methods. The transfer of methods from divergent to convergent systems is challenging, highlighting the importance of adequately representing model errors and incorporating parameter uncertainties in ensemble data assimilation for convergent systems.
Data assimilation methods are used throughout the geosciences to combine information from uncertain models and uncertain measurement data. However, the characteristics of geophysical systems differ and may be distinguished between divergent and convergent systems. In divergent systems initially nearby states will drift apart, while they will coalesce in convergent systems. This difference has implications for the application of sequential ensemble data assimilation methods. This study explores these implications on two exemplary systems, i.e., the divergent Lorenz 96 model and the convergent description of soil water movement by the Richards equation. The results show that sequential ensemble data assimilation methods require a sufficient divergent component. This makes the transfer of the methods from divergent to convergent systems challenging. We demonstrate, through a set of case studies, that it is imperative to represent model errors adequately and incorporate parameter uncertainties in ensemble data assimilation in convergent systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据