4.8 Article

Quantification of global and national nitrogen budgets for crop production

期刊

NATURE FOOD
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 529-540

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00318-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Research Coordination Network [DEB-1049744/1547041]
  2. National Science Foundation [CNS-1739823, CBET-2047165, CBET-2025826]
  3. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) [JPNP18016]
  4. FAO Regular Budget
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  6. European Commission ERDF Ramon y Cajal grant [RYC-2016-20269]
  7. Programa Propio from UPM
  8. Comunidad de Madrid (Spain)
  9. ERDF
  10. ESF
  11. project AGRISOST-CM [S2018/BAA-4330]
  12. Spanish MINECO AgroScena-UP [PID2019-107972RB-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Input-output estimates of nitrogen on cropland are essential for improving nitrogen management and understanding the global nitrogen cycle. While most datasets show similar patterns, some annual estimates vary widely, leading to large ranges of uncertainty. The comparison of nitrogen budget terms by country reveals areas for improvement.
Input-output estimates of nitrogen on cropland are essential for improving nitrogen management and better understanding the global nitrogen cycle. Here, we compare 13 nitrogen budget datasets covering 115 countries and regions over 1961-2015. Although most datasets showed similar spatiotemporal patterns, some annual estimates varied widely among them, resulting in large ranges and uncertainty. In 2010, global medians (in TgN yr(-1)) and associated minimum-maximum ranges were 73 (64-84) for global harvested crop nitrogen; 161 (139-192) for total nitrogen inputs; 86 (68-97) for nitrogen surplus; and 46% (40-53%) for nitrogen use efficiency. Some of the most uncertain nitrogen budget terms by country showed ranges as large as their medians, revealing areas for improvement. A benchmark nitrogen budget dataset, derived from central tendencies of the original datasets, can be used in model comparisons and inform sustainable nitrogen management in food systems. Different methods are currently used to quantify nitrogen use efficiency. The comparison of three such methods based on real-world experiments shows the impact of indicator choice on results, while highlighting the importance of long-term observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据