4.7 Article

Hydrothermal carbonization valorization as an alternative application for corn bio-ethanol by-products

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105431

关键词

Corn byproducts; Hydrochar; Hydrothermal carbonization; Process water; Valorization

资金

  1. Biomass Canada of BioFuelNet Canada Network [ASC-16]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA)
  3. NSERC Discovery Grant, Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the hydrothermal carbonization of Corn Fibre and CDS, finding that the produced hydrochar has high heating value and nitrogen content, making it a promising alternative for producing valuable chemicals or high-quality hydrochar.
Corn Wet Distillers' Fibre (Corn Fibre) and Corn Condensed Distillers' Solubles (CDS) are by-products of the corn-ethanol production process with limited investigation of their valorization potential available in the literature. In this work, we perform hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) on Corn Fibre and CDS at reaction temperatures ranging from 180 degrees C to 300 degrees C. The solid products were characterized by ultimate and proximate analysis, HHV, TGA, FT-IR, Py-GC-MS, and SEM. The liquid process water composition was characterized by GC-MS analysis, and the total organic carbon (TOC) was determined. The produced hydrochar had a higher heating value of up to 33.91 MJ/kg, and nitrogen content as high as 3.91% Nitrogen at 77.35% Carbon. The hydrochar had a much higher ratio of hydrogen to oxygen content than most hydrochars from biomass investigated in the literature. The process water for CDS had a high quantity of hydrocarbons and high liquid carbon yield, whereas the process water from Corn Fibre contains large quantities of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). These findings indicate that HTC of Corn Fibre and CDS may be a promising alternative pathway for producing valuable chemicals or high-quality hydrochar for fuel or higher value applications which can utilize nitrogen content, such as activated carbons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据