4.6 Article

Dimeric Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes of a common carboxylate-appended (2-pyridyl)alkylamine ligand: structure, magnetism and DFT study

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 35, 页码 16019-16029

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj01150b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science & Technology, Government of India [CRG/2018/000151]
  2. Spanish Ministerio Espanol de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [PID2019-109735GB-I00]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [AICO/2020/183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four new coordination complexes with different metal ions and ligand structures have been synthesized and characterized. Structural analysis and magnetic measurements reveal the structure and magnetic properties of these complexes, providing important insights for further research.
Four new complexes of composition [M-2(II)(L-3)(2)(CH3OH)(2)](ClO4)(2) (M = Mn, 1; Co, 2; Ni, 3) and [Cu-2(II)(L-3)(2)](ClO4)(2) (4) (L-3(-) = 3-[2-(((6-methyl)pyridin-2-yl)methyl){(dimethylamino)ethyl}-amino]propionate) have been synthesized and characterized. Structural analysis reveals that 1-4 are discrete syn-anti carboxylate-bridged binuclear coordination complexes with a {M-2(II)(-O-C-O-)(2)}(2+) structural motif. In 1-3 distorted octahedral MN3O3 and in 4 distorted square pyramidal CuN3O2 coordination is satisfied at each M(II) center by three N (a pyridyl and two tertiary aliphatic amines) and a carboxylate O of the ligand, and an O of the carboxylate group. In 1-3 the M(II) center is also coordinated by a CH3OH molecule. Variable-temperature magnetic measurements reveal the presence of weak antiferromagnetic interactions in 1 and weak ferromagnetic interactions in 2-4. The electronic structure of 1-4 has been probed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP level of theory. In order to gain insight into the origin of the observed electronic transitions, time-dependent (TD)-DFT calculations have been done.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据