Wear of 3D printed and CAD/CAM milled interim resin materials after chewing simulation

PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the wear resistance and surface roughness of three interim resin materials, which were subjected to chewing simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three interim resin materials were evaluated: (1) three-dimensional (3D) printed (digital light processing type), (2) computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milled, and (3) conventional polymethyl methacrylate interim resin materials. A total of 48 substrate specimens were prepared. The specimens were divided into two subgroups and subjected to 30,000 or 60,000 cycles of chewing simulation (n = 8). The wear volume loss and surface roughness of the materials were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using oneway analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=.05). RESULTS. The mean +/- standard deviation values of wear volume loss (in mm(3)) against the metal abrader after 60,000 cycles were 0.10 +/- 0.01 for the 3D printed resin, 0.21 +/- 0.02 for the milled resin, and 0.44 +/- 0.01 for the conventional resin. Statistically significant differences among volume losses were found in the order of 3D printed, milled, and conventional interim materials (P <.001). After 60,000 cycles of simulated chewing, the mean surface roughness (Ra; mu m) values for 3D printed, milled, and conventional materials were 0.59 +/- 0.06, 1.27 +/- 0.49, and 1.64 +/- 0.44, respectively. A significant difference was found in the Ra value between 3D printed and conventional materials (P =.01). CONCLUSION. The interim restorative materials for additive and subtractive manufacturing digital technologies exhibited less wear volume loss than the conventional interim resin. The 3D printed interim restorative material showed a smoother surface than the conventional interim material after simulated chewing.

Automated summary

The study aimed to compare the wear resistance and surface roughness of three interim resin materials under chewing simulation. The results showed that the 3D printed resin material exhibited the least wear volume loss after 60,000 cycles, with a smoother surface compared to conventional resin material.