4.2 Article

Defining Targets for Adsorbent Material Performance to Enable Viable BECCS Processes

期刊

JACS AU
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 795-806

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.0c00127

关键词

BECCS; Adsorption; CO2 Capture; Technoeconotnic Analysis; Degradation

资金

  1. Center for Understanding and Control of Acid Gas-Induced Evolution of Materials for Energy, an Energy Frontier Research Center - United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), at the Georgia Institute of Tech [DESC0012577]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study defines the target properties of CO2 capture adsorbents that would ensure economic viability of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), emphasizing working capacity, lifetime, heat of adsorption, and exponential degradation decay constants. The research predicts that a BECCS process cost of $65/t-CO2 can be achieved with specific adsorbent properties, including cost, working capacity, heat of adsorption, and minimum lifetime.
Target properties of CO2 capture adsorbents that would ensure economic viability of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) are defined. The key role of sorbent lifetime in the process cost is demonstrated, and an optimal heat of adsorption for BECCS is postulated through a balance of adsorbent-adsorbate affinity and regeneration energy demand. Using an exponential decay model of sorbent capacity increases the process cost and results in an optimum sorbent lifetime. To ensure a levelized cost of carbon below $100/tonne-CO2, adsorbents should be designed to have working capacities above 0.75 mol/kg, lifetimes over 2 years, heats of adsorption of approximately -40 kJ/mol, and exponential degradation decay constants below 5 x 10(-6) cycle(-1) (equivalent to a half-life of 1.3 years). Our model predicts a BECCS process cost of $65/t-CO2 can be achieved with a degradation-resistant adsorbent, $40/kg sorbent cost, 2.0 mol/kg working capacity, -40 kJ/mol heat of adsorption, and at least a 2 year lifetime.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据