4.6 Review

New horizons in drug discovery of lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) inhibitors: a decade review (2011-2021) focussing on structure-activity relationship (SAR) and docking insights

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1937143

关键词

Lck inhibitors; structure-activity relationship (SAR); Src family kinase; lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck); molecular modelling

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2018R1A5A2023127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck), a non-receptor Src family kinase, plays a crucial role in regulating cellular processes and T-cell functions. Alterations in Lck expression and activity can lead to various diseases, prompting research efforts to develop new Lck inhibitors and explore their binding modes within the active site of Lck for potential therapeutic applications.
Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck), a non-receptor Src family kinase, has a vital role in various cellular processes such as cell cycle control, cell adhesion, motility, proliferation, and differentiation. Lck is reported as a key factor regulating the functions of T-cell including the initiation of TCR signalling, T-cell development, in addition to T-cell homeostasis. Alteration in expression and activity of Lck results in numerous disorders such as cancer, asthma, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, and neuronal diseases. Accordingly, Lck has emerged as a novel target against different diseases. Herein, we amass the research efforts in literature and pharmaceutical patents during the last decade to develop new Lck inhibitors. Additionally, structure-activity relationship studies (SAR) and docking models of these new inhibitors within the active site of Lck were demonstrated offering deep insights into their different binding modes in a step towards the identification of more potent, selective, and safe Lck inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据