4.2 Article

Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Using an Automated Diagnostic System Based on Deep Learning: Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 244, 期 3, 页码 250-257

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000512638

关键词

Diabetic retinopathy; Screening; Artificial intelligence; Automated diagnosis

资金

  1. Fraunhofer Portugal AICOS (Porto, Portugal)
  2. Project MDevNet -National Network for Transfer of Knowledge of Medical Devices

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a CNN model for automated screening of diabetic retinopathy. The CNN model showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing referable DR, which can significantly reduce the burden on ophthalmologists.
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a diagnostic system software for the automated screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on digital colour fundus photographs, the 2019 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model with Inception-V3. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 295 fundus images were analysed by the CNN model and compared to a panel of ophthalmologists. Images were obtained from a dataset acquired within a screening programme. Diagnostic accuracy measures and respective 95% CI were calculated. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the CNN model in diagnosing referable DR was 81% (95% CI 66-90%) and 97% (95% CI 95-99%), respectively. Positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI 72-94%) and negative predictive value 96% (95% CI 93-98%). The positive likelihood ratio was 33 (95% CI 15-75) and the negative was 0.20 (95% CI 0.11-0.35). Its clinical impact is demonstrated by the change observed in the pre-test probability of referable DR (assuming a prevalence of 16%) to a post-test probability for a positive test result of 86% and for a negative test result of 4%. Conclusion: A CNN model negative test result safely excludes DR, and its use may significantly reduce the burden of ophthalmologists at reading centres.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据