4.7 Article

Precision calculation of dark radiation from spinning primordial black holes and early matter-dominated eras

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 103, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123549

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-2014075]
  2. DOE [desc0009956]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents precision calculations of dark radiation from spinning primordial black holes (PBHs) in the early Universe, including extended spin distributions, PBH reheating temperature, and relativistic degrees of freedom. Comparisons with existing literature show constraints on PBHs from dark radiation, with projections from CMB Stage 4 experiments. Results indicate that CMB Stage 4 experiments will probe all PBH masses up to 10^9 grams, as well as PBHs with monochromatic spins a* > 0.81.
We present precision calculations of dark radiation in the form of gravitons coming from Hawking evaporation of spinning primordial black holes (PBHs) in the early Universe. Our calculation incorporates a careful treatment of extended spin distributions of a population of PBHs, the PBH reheating temperature, and the number of relativistic degrees of freedom. We compare our precision results with those existing in the literature and show constraints on PBHs from current bounds on dark radiation from big bang nucleosynthesis and the cosmic microwave background (CMB), as well as the projected sensitivity of CMB Stage 4 experiments. As an application, we consider the case of PBHs formed during an early matter-dominated era (EMDE). We calculate graviton production from various PBH spin distributions pertinent to EMDEs and find that PBHs in the entire mass range up to 10(9) g will be constrained by measurements from CMB Stage 4 experiments, assuming PBHs come to dominate the Universe prior to Hawking evaporation. We also find that for PBHs with monochromatic spins a* > 0.81, all PBH masses in the range 10(-1) g < M-BH < 10(9) g will be probed by CMB Stage 4 experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据