4.0 Article

Assessing 5-Year Outcomes of an Academic Pediatrics-Community Partnership Focused on Rural Child Health

出版社

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS

关键词

Child health; Rural health services; Community health partnerships; Program evaluation; Community health services

资金

  1. Seattle Children's Hospital librarian Sue Groshong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The REACH program successfully applied community-based participatory research principles to engage stakeholders, develop evaluation measures, and received positive feedback. Key themes include building relationships, professional expertise, and trainees as catalysts.
Background: The Resident Education in Advocacy and Child Health (REACH) pathway at a large academic pediatric residency program in the Northwest includes an academic-community partnership in a rural community. Few academic-community partnership evaluations have focused on community values. REACH trainees conducted a 5-year evaluation of the partnership using community-generated outcomes measures. We sought to 1) apply community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles to engage community stakeholders, 2) mutually develop program evaluation measures, and 3) describe core projects and the community's perceptions of the REACH program. A secondary objective was to evaluate REACH pathway influence on trainee alumni. Methods: We used a community-informed design to determine outcomes and indicators, 2) gathered data through iterative review of materials, stakeholder interviews, and alumni surveys, and 3) conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis and synthesis. Results: Four short-term outcomes measures were identified for a logic model: 1) project sustainability, 2) direct engagement with youth, 3) Community partnerships, and 4) ripple effects. Of non-foundational projects, 50% were sustained at the time of the evaluation. Fourteen projects ( 70%) engaged youth. At least five ongoing community partnerships were identified. Four stakeholders (24%) noted a ripple effect. Trainee alumni reported increased confidence in research skills, cultural competence, and appreciation of community perspectives. Key themes of the partnership's value were relationships, outsider perspective and professional expertise, trainees as catalyst, and balance of research with action. Conclusions: Our evaluation demonstrated the partnership's value to community and trainees and yielded suggestions for increasing the program's impact. We believe that key elements of this evaluation could be used in other academic-community partnership programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据