4.3 Article

Multimodal AI to Improve Agriculture

期刊

IT PROFESSIONAL
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 53-57

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/MITP.2020.2986122

关键词

Training data; Project management; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Agriculture

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service [8260-88888003-00D, 2032-51530-026-00-D, 8042-22000-269-00-D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in natural language processing and computer vision are being applied to agricultural problems, but could be more powerful when combined with AI and numeric data sources. Challenges include obtaining high-quality training data and a lack of customized machine learning techniques.
Advances in natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision are now being applied to many agricultural problems. These techniques take advantage of nontraditional (or nonnumeric) data sources such as text in libraries and images from field operations. However, these techniques could be more powerful if combined with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and numeric sources of data in multimodal pipelines. We present several recent examples, where United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) researchers and collaborators are using AI methods with text and images to improve core scientific knowledge, the management of agricultural research, and agricultural practice. NLP enables automated indexing, clustering, and classification for agricultural research project management. We explore two case studies where combining techniques and data sources in new ways could accelerate progress in personalized nutrition and invasive pest detection. One challenge in applying these techniques is the difficulty in obtaining high-quality training data. Other challenges are a lack of machine learning (ML) techniques customized for use and ML skills or experience among researchers and other stakeholders. Initiatives are underway at USDA-ARS to address these challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据