4.2 Article

Monolithic metal-organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation

期刊

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 51-65

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1fd00017a

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (NanoMOFdeli) [ERC-2016-COG 726380]
  2. MINECO [PID2019-108453GB-C21]
  3. Innovate UK [104384]
  4. Innovate UK [104384] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide is a major contributor to global warming and an industrial impurity. Traditional carbon capture methods are costly and corrosive, while metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have gained attention for their tunable nature in capturing CO2.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is both a primary contributor to global warming and a major industrial impurity. Traditional approaches to carbon capture involve corrosive and energy-intensive processes such as liquid amine absorption. Although adsorptive separation has long been a promising alternative to traditional processes, up to this point there has been a lack of appropriate adsorbents capable of capturing CO2 whilst maintaining low regeneration energies. In the context of CO2 capture, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have gained much attention in the past two decades as potential materials. Their tuneable nature allows for precise control over the pore size and chemistry, which allows for the tailoring of their properties for the selective adsorption of CO2. While many candidate materials exist, the amount of research into material shaping for use in industrial processes has been limited. Traditional shaping strategies such as pelletisation involve the use of binders and/or mechanical processes, which can have a detrimental impact on the adsorption properties of the resulting materials or can result in low-density structures with low volumetric adsorption capacities. Herein, we demonstrate the use of a series of monolithic MOFs ((mono)UiO-66, (mono)UiO-66-NH2 & monoHKUST-1) for use in gas separation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据