4.7 Article

A Benchmark High-Resolution GaoFen-3 SAR Dataset for Building Semantic Segmentation

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3085122

关键词

Synthetic aperture radar; Semantics; Urban areas; Buildings; Image segmentation; Earth; Internet; Building segmentation; GaoFen-3; high-resolution; synthetic aperture radar (SAR)

资金

  1. KAKENHI [19K20309, 18K18067]
  2. JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Project [JPJSBP 120203211]
  3. Open Research Fund of National EarthObservationData Center [NODAOP2020021]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K20309, 18K18067] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep learning is popular in remote sensing, but there is still untapped potential for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, especially very high resolution (VHR) SAR. This article provides a benchmark dataset and reviews state-of-the-art methods to improve SAR semantic segmentation in the future.
Deep learning is increasingly popular in remote sensing communities and already successful in land cover classification and semantic segmentation. However, most studies are limited to the utilization of optical datasets. Despite few attempts applied to synthetic aperture radar (SAR) using deep learning, the huge potential, especially for the very high resolution (VHR) SAR, are still underexploited. Taking building segmentation as an example, the VHR SAR datasets are still missing to the best of our knowledge. A comparable baseline for SAR building segmentation does not exist, and which segmentation method is more suitable for SAR image is poorly understood. This article first provides a benchmark high-resolution (1 m) GaoFen-3 SAR datasets, which cover nine cities from seven countries, review the state-of-the-art semantic segmentation methods applied to SAR, and then summarize the potential operations to improve the performance. With these comprehensive assessments, we hope to provide the recommendation and roadmap for future SAR semantic segmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据