3.8 Article

Sustainability Assessment of Innovative Energy Technologies-Hydrogen from Wind Power as a Fuel for Mobility Applications

出版社

INT CENTRE SUSTAINABLE DEV ENERGY WATER & ENV SYSTEMS-SDEWES
DOI: 10.13044/j.sdewes.d8.0371

关键词

Sustainability assessment; Life Cycle Thinking; Hydrogen; Patent analysis; Public perception; Economic assessment; Mobility; Life Cycle Assessment

资金

  1. Helmholtz Association under the Joint Initiative Energy System 2050 -A Contribution of the Research Field Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for life-cycle-based sustainability assessment for innovative energy technologies was developed, with a case study on hydrogen supply showing that transportation via pipelines is the most sustainable option. However, social issues such as acceptance of hydrogen filling stations and decrease of local employment need to be addressed for the implementation of this technology.
An approach for life-cycle-based sustainability assessment for innovative energy technologies was developed that includes Life Cycle Assessment, economic assessment and selected social indicators, i.e. acceptance, patents and added value. As a case study for this approach, hydrogen supply by wind powered electrolysis was assessed and different distribution options to its final use in fuel cell vehicles were compared. First results of the Life Cycle Assessment show that lowest environmental impacts are caused by transporting hydrogen in pipelines, which is also the most cost-effective option. The preliminary survey about hydrogen refuelling stations showed that the fear of explosions is most relevant to people. Regarding added value, it could be revealed that a slight shift from domestic to more globalised expenditures is to be expected in the future. It can be concluded that hydrogen supply by pipelines is the most sustainable option. However, for the implementation of this technology, social issues such as acceptance of hydrogen filling stations and decrease of local employment have to be addressed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据