4.7 Article

A Highly Receptive ZnO-Based Enzymatic Electrochemical Sensor for Glucose Sensing

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 13, 页码 14601-14608

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3069303

关键词

Zinc oxide; II-VI semiconductor materials; Iron; Electrodes; Sensors; Lattices; Zinc; Sensor systems; electromechanical sensors; biosensors; nanomaterials; amperometric sensors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nano-structured Zinc Oxide (ZnO) was synthesized using the hydrothermal method and modified with Cobalt (Co), Iron (Fe), and a mixture of Co and Fe (Co-Fe) for glucose sensing. Doped samples showed reduced photoluminescence intensity compared to pristine ZnO, with (Co-Fe) doped electrodes demonstrating better conductivity. The GOx-modified (Co-Fe) doped ZnO sensor exhibited a 2-fold sensitivity enhancement, making it a potential candidate for clinical diagnosis, industry, and food science applications.
The nano-structured Zinc Oxide (ZnO) has been synthesized by using hydrothermal method and modified via doping of Cobalt (Co), Iron (Fe), a mixture of Co and Fe (Co-Fe) for glucose sensing. The formations of pristine ZnO and doped ZnO have been confirmed by X-Ray diffraction (XRD), which suggests the incorporation of doping elements into the ZnO Matrix. The doped samples show a decrement in photoluminescence intensity in comparison to pristine ZnO, which is an indicative of the formation of competitive pathways for the recombination process. (Co-Fe) doped electrode shows better conductivity than other electrodes, which was later modified with Glucose Oxidase (GO(x)) for the application of electrochemical sensor. GOx modified (Co-Fe) doped ZnO sensor exhibits enhanced 2-fold sensitivity (32.2 mu A mM(-1)cm(-2)) in comparison to the pristine ZnO sensors following the linear range of 0-4 mM, response time 6.21 seconds and K-m(app) value of 0.054 mM. This sensor would be a potential candidate in clinical diagnosis, industry, and food science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据