4.8 Article

Kinetics of moisture-induced phase transformation in inorganic halide perovskite

期刊

MATTER
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 2392-2402

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.04.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division [DE-AC02-05CH11231, KC3103]
  2. US DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. Suzhou Industrial Park
  4. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [V439819N, 12Y7221N]
  5. Samsung Scholarship
  6. MOE Technologies Incubation Scholarship from Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental evidence shows that the phase transformation of cesium lead iodide under controlled relative humidity is nucleation limited, with higher humidity leading to a lower nucleation barrier. Heating between 40 degrees C and 80 degrees C facilitates water desorption and suppresses phase transformation.
The high-temperature (high-T) phase of cesium lead iodide (CsPbI3) presents great promise for photovoltaic applications; however, exposure to ambient moisture at room temperature transforms it into its less-desirable low-temperature (low-T) phase with a larger band gap. While there have been theoretical predictions on the influence of moisture level on the phase transformation kinetics, the corresponding quantitative experimental evidence has remained limited. Tracking CsPbI3 phase transformation under controlled relative humidity (RH), we find that rising RH increases the nucleation rate of low-T CsPbI3 exponentially, but has a weak effect on its growth. The overall transformation is nucleation limited, with higher RH leading to a lower nucleation barrier. Finally, we find that heating between 40 degrees C and 80 degrees C facilitates water desorption and suppresses phase transformation. Our findings elucidate the relationship between moisture and the phase energetics of CsPbI3, which can serve as references for thin film applications of CsPbI3 and future designs of stable photovoltaics systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据