4.6 Article

Opinion Dynamics With Competitive Relationship and Switching Topologies

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 3016-3025

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047893

关键词

Opinion dynamics; consensus; polarization; DeGroot model; signed graph

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61703003, 61873294]
  2. Research Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Anhui Province [1908085J04]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui [1708085QA16]
  4. Top Talent Project of Department of Anhui Education [gxgwfx2018038]
  5. Top Talent Project of Anhui Polytechnic University [2017BJRC012, 2018JQ01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates a discrete-time opinion dynamics model with competitive relationship and switching topologies in social networks. It explores the impact of structurally balanced and unbalanced network topologies on opinion diffusion, and identifies conditions for opinion polarization or neutrality. Two examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the obtained results.
In this paper, the discrete-time opinion dynamics model with competitive relationship and switching topologies is investigated. Different from the usual DeGroot model, competition between individuals and the switching topologies are considered in a social network. Furthermore, the structurally balanced and unbalanced network topologies are investigated simultaneously. It is shown that if all network topologies are structurally balanced and include a spanning tree, then there may appear polarization, neutralization or fluctuation. And we also find conditions under which the group is split into two clusters at most, specifically, opinions will reach polarization (bipartite consensus) or all individuals will remain neutrality (consensus). If there exist the structurally unbalanced network topologies in social networks, we obtain the condition in which all individuals will finally hold the neutral attitude on the discussed topic. Two examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the obtained results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据