3.8 Article

Monitoring the Water Quality Benefits of a Triangular Swale Treating a Highway Runoff

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000929

关键词

-

资金

  1. NC Department of Transportation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presented a grassed swale in Knightdale, North Carolina, and its water quality treatment efficiency during over 30 runoff events. The results indicated that the swale could effectively reduce the discharge of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended solids, but had limitations for certain particle sizes.
Swales are among the most commonly used stormwater control measures (SCMs) worldwide. In 2009, the North Carolina DOT constructed a grassed swale in Knightdale, North Carolina, in the right-of-way of Interstate 540 near Mango Creek. The swale had a rock-lined forebay, v-shaped cross-section, a sinuosity of 1.1, 2% longitudinal slope, and 37-m centerline length. The swale was vegetated with tall fescue sod and partly below the Interstate 540 southbound bridge deck. Flow-volume weighted, composite water quality samples were collected for more than 30 runoff events at the inlet and outlet of the swale and tested for nitrogen species [total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia-nitrogen (TAN), and nitrate- and nitrate-nitrogen (NO3)], total phosphorous (TP), and total suspended solids (TSS). The mean effluent total nitrogen, total phosphorous, and total suspended solids concentrations released by the swale were 0.99, 0.16, and 39 mg/L, respectively. Particle size distributions analyzed for three storms showed that the swale and its forebay most easily transported particles in the range of 0.4-40 mu m and most effectively trapped particles in the range of 100-2,000 mu m in diameter. Although this swale reduced the pollutants associated with coarse particulates (typical of highway runoff), coupling swales with other SCMs is recommended to meet target total nitrogen (TN) and TP thresholds. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据