3.9 Article

Evaluation of La(XT), a novel lanthanide compound, in an OVX rat model of osteoporosis

期刊

BONE REPORTS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.100753

关键词

Osteoporosis; Lanthanum; La(XT); OVX; Toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of a novel lanthanum compound, La (XT), in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis were evaluated. The treatment did not show kidney or liver toxicities, and increased trabecular bone stiffness.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a novel lanthanum compound, La (XT), in an ovariectomized (OVX) rat model of osteoporosis. Methods: Twenty-four ovariectomized female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups receiving a research diet with/without treatment compounds (alendronate: 3 mg/kg; La(XT) 100 mg/kg) for three months. At the time of sacrifice, the kidney, liver, brain, lung and spleen were collected for histological examination. The trabecular bone structure of the tibiae was evaluated using micro-CT and a three-point metaphyseal mechanical test was used to evaluate bone failure load and stiffness. Results: No significant differences were noted in plasma levels of calcium, phosphorus, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) between the La(XT) treatment compared to the non-treated OVX group. Alendronate-treated animals (positive control) showed higher BV/TV, Tb.N and lower Tb.Th and Tb.Sp when compared to the non-treated OVX group. Mechanical analysis indicated that stiffness was higher in the alendronate (32.88%, p = 0.04) when compared to the non-treated OVX group. Failure load did not differ among the groups. Conclusions: No kidney or liver toxicities of La(XT) treatments were found during the three-month study. The absence of liver and kidney toxicity with drug treatment for 3 months, as well as the increased trabecular bone stiffness are encouraging for the pursuit of further studies with La(XT) for a longer duration of time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据