4.6 Article

Block Cipher Nonlinear Confusion Components Based on New 5-D Hyperchaotic System

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 87686-87696

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090163

关键词

Ciphers; Security; Encryption; Trajectory; Licenses; Boolean functions; Watermarking; Block ciphers; hyperchaotic system; substitution-box; security

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes a novel scheme for generating cryptographically strong nonlinear confusion components for block ciphers, referred to as S-boxes. The design is based on a novel five-dimensional chaotic system, aiming to optimize the S-box for high nonlinearity score to enhance resistance against linear attacks. Performance analysis demonstrates the proposed S-box's better strength and features compared to recently investigated S-boxes.
The security strengths of block ciphers greatly rely on the confusion components which have the tendency to transform the data nonlinearly into the perplexed form. This paper proposes to put forward a novel scheme of generating cryptographically strong nonlinear confusion components of block ciphers, usually termed as substitution-boxes (S-boxes). The anticipated S-box design scheme is based on a novel five-dimensional (5-D) chaotic system analyzed in this paper. The proposed 5-D dynamical system consists of hyperchaotic phenomenon, KY dimension, conservativity, unstable equilibrium point, and complex phase attractors which are suited for cryptographic applications. The S-box based on hyperchaotic system is made to evolve in order to generate an optimized S-box for high nonlinearity score to make it robust against many linear attacks. The performance analysis of proposed S-box demonstrates that it has bijectivity, high nonlinearity; satisfied strict avalanche criterion and bits independent criterion; low differential and linear probabilities. Moreover, performance appraisal of proposed S-box justifies its better strength and features over many recently investigated S-boxes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据