3.8 Proceedings Paper

Charge storage in the PANI-α-MnO2 polymer-nanocomposite system

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 513-519

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.235

关键词

Energy storage materials; Electrochemical double layer capacitors; Battery-supercapacitor hybrids; Electrochemical charge storage; Asymmetric supercapacitors

资金

  1. Malaysian Ministry of Education under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, FRGS [RDU190142]
  2. Malaysian Ministry of Education under UMP Internal Grant [RDU192207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article systematically investigates the structural, morphological, surface, and electrochemical properties of a polymer nanocomposite in the PANI-alpha-MnO2 system. By modifying PANI, a shift in charge storage mechanism from pseudocapacitive type to battery-type was observed.
Supercapacitors (SCs) store electrochemical energy with high specific power, faster charge response, and long cycle life at an electrode-electrolyte interface; however, with lower specific energy than commercial batteries. In this article, structural, morphological, surface and electrochemical properties of a polymernanocomposite in the PANI-alpha-MnO2 system has been systematically investigated. The alpha-MnO2 was synthesized by molten salt methods and the polymeric composite was developed by in-situ polymerization. The materials were characterized by thermal analyses, X-ray and electron diffraction, FTIR spectroscopy, gas adsorption studies, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The electrochemical properties of the materials before and after PANI modification are studied in 6 M KOH aqueous electrolyte employing cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge cycling, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. A difference in charge storage mechanism from pseudocapacitive type to battery-type was observed upon PANI modification and the corresponding charge storage and charge kinetic parameters have been detailed. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据