4.5 Review

Advances in super-resolution fluorescence microscopy for the study of nano-cell interactions

期刊

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 16, 页码 5444-5456

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1bm00676b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Innovative Research Groups [51621002]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1105700]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JKVD12001002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the interactions between nanomaterials and biological systems is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of nanomedicines and deepening the understanding of the biological domain. Fluorescence microscopy allows direct visualization of fluorescent-labeled nanomaterials in the intracellular microenvironment, while the development of super-resolution techniques enables more comprehensive studies of nano-cell interactions.
Understanding the interactions between nanomaterials and biological systems plays an essential role in enhancing the efficacy of nanomedicines and deepening the understanding of the biological domain. Fluorescence microscopy is a powerful optical imaging technique that allows direct visualization of the behavior of fluorescent-labeled nanomaterials in the intracellular microenvironment. However, conventional fluorescence microscopy, such as confocal microscopy, has limited optical resolution due to the diffraction of light and therefore cannot provide the precise details of nanomaterials with diameters of less than similar to 250 nm. Fortunately, the development of super-resolution fluorescence microscopy has overcome the resolution limitation, enabling more comprehensive studies of nano-cell interactions. Herein, we have summarized the recent advances in nano-cell interactions investigated by a variety of super-resolution microscopic techniques, which may benefit researchers in this multi-disciplinary area by providing a guideline to select appropriate platforms for studying materiobiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据