4.7 Review

The neurological sequelae of pandemics and epidemics

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 268, 期 8, 页码 2629-2655

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10261-3

关键词

CNS infections; Peripheral neuropathies; Pandemics; history; Meningitis; Encephalitis

资金

  1. Academic Clinical Fellowship
  2. NIHR through the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre grant
  3. Academy of Medical Sciences/The Health Foundation Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurological manifestations in pandemics are often overlooked, despite the potential for short and long-term consequences. Limited recognition of these manifestations may lead to increased burden of acute disease and secondary complications. Infections or dysfunction of the nervous system during pandemics are common, especially among vulnerable populations, and understanding the mechanisms and manifestations is crucial for future outbreaks.
Neurological manifestations in pandemics frequently cause short and long-term consequences which are frequently overlooked. Despite advances in the treatment of infectious diseases, nervous system involvement remains a challenge, with limited treatments often available. The under-recognition of neurological manifestations may lead to an increase in the burden of acute disease as well as secondary complications with long-term consequences. Nervous system infection or dysfunction during pandemics is common and its enduring consequences, especially among vulnerable populations, are frequently forgotten. An improved understanding the possible mechanisms of neurological damage during epidemics, and increased recognition of the possible manifestations is fundamental to bring insights when dealing with future outbreaks. To reverse this gap in knowledge, we reviewed all the pandemics, large and important epidemics of human history in which neurological manifestations are evident, and described the possible physiological processes that leads to the adverse sequelae caused or triggered by those pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据