4.2 Article

Cul4b Promotes Progression of Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma Patients by Regulating CDKN2A

期刊

TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 254, 期 1, 页码 33-39

出版社

TOHOKU UNIV MEDICAL PRESS
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.254.33

关键词

CDKN2A; Cul4b; cutaneous melanoma; proliferation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that high expression of Cul4b is associated with poor prognosis in some cutaneous malignant melanoma patients, suggesting it may be an independent prognostic risk factor. Knocking down Cul4b can inhibit the proliferation ability of melanoma cells and downregulate the expression of CDKN2A, indicating its potential as a promising treatment target for cutaneous melanoma.
Although several molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy have been developed, cutaneous melanoma prognosis is still not satisfying. Cul4b promotes the progression of several malignant tumors by regulating cell proliferation. However, its prognostic role in malignant cutaneous melanoma has not been evaluated. In this study, immunohistochemistry was performed to assess the expression of Cul4b in a consecutive patient cohort. The prognostic role of Cul4b was estimated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Cul4b was knocked down in melanoma cell line to evaluate its role in promoting cell proliferation. The results revealed that Cul4b was highly expressed in some of the cutaneous malignant melanoma patients and high expression of Cul4b was associated with poor melanoma-specific overall survival and poor disease-free survival. Cul4b expression was associated with Breslow categories, Clark level, and Ki67 expression. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that Cul4b is an independent prognosis risk factor of cutaneous melanoma. Downregulation of Cul4b inhibited the proliferation ability of melanoma cells and downregulated the expression of CDKN2A. These results suggest that Cul4b plays an essential role in cutaneous melanoma progression and may serve as a promising treatment target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据