4.3 Article

Prioritization for conservation of Iranian native cattle breeds based on genome-wide SNP data

期刊

CONSERVATION GENETICS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 77-89

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-015-0762-9

关键词

Conservation; Effective population size; Runs of homozygosity; Iranian native cattle

资金

  1. Next Generation BioGreen 21 Program [PJ008196]
  2. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive identification of the breed characteristics is essential for the effective management of farm animal genetic resources. The objective of this study was to estimate effective population size, genomic inbreeding coefficients, autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity, and genetic diversity in Iranian native cattle using dense SNP markers. Ten samples per breed were collected from eight Iranian native cattle breeds representing the Sarabi, Kurdi, Najdi, Taleshi, Mazandarani, Pars, Kermani, and Sistani breeds. Samples were genotyped for 777,962 SNPs using the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip, and after quality control 450,341 SNPs were kept for further analyses. The estimated effective population size (Ne) was relatively small for all breeds, varying from Ne = 13 (Sarabi) to Ne = 107 (Mazandarani). Analysis of runs of homozygosity in different cut-off lengths was applied to provide information on the recent and ancient inbreeding occurrences in each population. The inbreeding coefficients estimated by runs of homozygosity varied between breeds. Sarabi, Pars, and Sistani breeds had higher proportion of long runs of homozygosity, likely to reflect recent inbreeding, while Kermani breed had the higher number of short runs of homozygosity. Some breeds such as Sarabi, Sistani, Pars, Taleshi, and Kermani are exposed to serious risk of extinction and other breeds, except Mazandarani, have no promising situations. Higher priority should be given to conservation programming in Sarabi and Sistani breeds due to unique genetic composition and critical conservation status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据