4.6 Article

Simplified Approach for Seismic Performance Assessment of Dry-Joint Masonry Arch Bridges

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings11070313

关键词

dry-joint masonry arch; stone masonry; numerical modeling; time history analysis; thrust line; seismic performance; retrofitting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a hybrid methodology for assessing the seismic performance of dry-joint masonry arches, combining a simple finite element micro model with principles of limit analysis method. Kinematic conditions leading to possible collapse mechanisms were traced and applied to evaluate seismic risk of an ancient Roman arch bridge in close proximity to a fault line.
The seismic performance assessment of dry-joint masonry arches is challenging because of their unique structural characteristics. Widely used assessment methods developed for frame-type structures require the use of a material-dependent section response. In contrast, the response of a dry-joint arch is not dependent on the material capacity but characterized by the sustainment of stability, primarily depending on rigid body rotation or sliding motion at the interfaces between the adjacent voussoirs. A hybrid methodology, combining a simple finite element micro model with principles of limit analysis method, is proposed in this work for the seismic performance assessment of these structures. The nonlinearity is concentrated at interfaces of the model by means of shear and compression-only axial springs. Kinematic conditions yielding a possible collapse mechanism were traced at every step of the time history analysis by checking the failure of individual interfaces. The procedure is applied to an ancient dry-joint Roman arch bridge in close proximity to the North Anatolian fault subject to significant seismic risk. Along with the performance of the system in its current state, the effects of retrofitting measures were investigated in the scope of this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据