4.5 Article

Impact of Job Engagement on the Quality of Nursing Services: The Effect of Person-Centered Nursing in South Korean Nurses

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070826

关键词

nurses; work engagement; nursing services; patient-centered care; quality of care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a significant positive correlation between job engagement, person-centered nursing, and quality of nursing services among Korean nurses. Person-centered nursing was found to have a mediating and moderating role in the relationship between job engagement and quality of nursing service.
Nurses' job engagement could help improve the quality of nursing services, and person-centered nursing is expected to play an important role in this relationship. However, little is known about the role of person-centered nursing in the association between job engagement and quality of nursing services. This study examines the moderating and mediating effects of person-centered nursing on the relationship between the job engagement and the quality of nursing services in Korean nurses. In October 2020, 200 hospital nurses were surveyed at three university hospitals. The moderating and mediating effects of person-centered nursing were determined using hierarchical regression analysis. There was a significant positive correlation between job engagement, person-centered nursing, and quality of nursing services. Person-centered nursing was found to have a mediating and moderating role in the relationship between job engagement and quality of nursing service. In conclusion, in the impact of job engagement on the quality of nursing service, it plays a buffering role, and the job engagement of nurses improves the quality of nursing services through improvement of person-centered nursing. Therefore, this study recommends the development and implementation of an educational program to foster person-centered nursing in order to improve the quality of nursing services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据