4.1 Article

Exploring Social Sciences Students' Perceptions on Information Literacy and the Use of Mobile Technologies in Higher Education

期刊

COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 662-682

出版社

ASSOC COLL RESEARCH LIBRARIES

关键词

-

资金

  1. national R&D project Innovation and training in the information competencies of university teachers and students in the Social Sciences [CSO2016-80147-R]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through a survey of undergraduate students in social sciences, the study found that students have a higher perception of personal dimension of information literacy, but have less understanding of the threshold concepts of the ACRL Framework, and responses regarding the use of ICT and mobile technologies are also diverse.
This study aims to examine information literacy (IL) and the use of mobile technologies in the educational sphere by a sample of social sciences undergraduate students (N = 1,390). The study used the MOBILE-APPS questionnaire, which is a scale for measuring students' perceptions regarding information literacy (both the institutional and as a personal dimension), the threshold concepts of the ACRL Framework and the use of ICT and mobile technologies in learning contexts. The survey was distributed to a sample of four universities and eight Social Sciences degrees in Spain. A descriptive, inferential, and multivariate study is performed, regarding age, course, gender, and degree. The results show that student perception is higher concerning the personal dimension of IL; most of the students are unaware of the threshold concepts of the ACRL Framework, and responses are very heterogeneous in relation to the use of ICT and mobile technologies. An MDS-clustering strategy regarding the diverse degrees that participate in the study is also provided, to grasp a disciplinary view. From the diagnosis developed in this research, some recommendations for teaching activity in IL as well as implications for academic libraries are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据