4.3 Article

Artificial Receptor-Based Optical Sensors (AROS): Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Urea

期刊

ADVANCED PHOTONICS RESEARCH
卷 2, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adpr.202100044

关键词

biosensors; interferometry; molecular imprinting polymers; tapered microfibers; urea

资金

  1. SPARC program of MHRD
  2. DST INSPIRE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of optical fiber interferometry and molecular imprinting technology offers great potential for developing specific bio-detection systems, but the specificity limitation of fiber optic sensors hinders their suitability for certain applications. AROS system integrated with artificial MIP has demonstrated unprecedented sensitivity and selectivity, making it ideal for ultra-sensitive detection of urea with extremely low detection limits.
The combined approach of optical fiber interferometry with molecular imprinting technology has shown a tremendous potential for developing a specific and sophisticated bio-detection system with high degree of resolution and sensitivity. However, the specificity limitation of the fiber optic sensors renders them unsuitable for several key applications. Molecular imprinted polymer (MIP), an indispensable artificial molecular receptor with a complementary structure and functionality for the target analyte, possesses the ability to overcome the limitations of specificity. Therefore, a new class of artificial receptor-based optical sensors (AROS) constructed from an optical fiber interferometer integrated with artificial MIP for selective and ultrasensitive sensing of urea is demonstrated. The sensor device shows an unprecedented sensitivity of 0.584x10(11)nmm (-1) and a lower detection limit of 17.1fM with a wide dynamic range of 10(-11)-10(-4)m. This demonstration of an ultrasensitive, selective, and accurate AROS system is bound to find potential applications that requires remote sensing in harsh environmental conditions with large fluctuations in the temperature, pressure, and humidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据