4.4 Article

Experimental Tests of DC SFCL Under Low Impedance and High Impedance Fault Conditions

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3065886

关键词

Fault current limiters; power system protection; short-circuit currents; yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO)

资金

  1. U.K. EPSRC [EP/S000720/1]
  2. U.K. Royal Society InternationalExchanges 2018 Cost Share (China): AdvancedDCfault protection by integration of superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) with DC circuit breaker [IEC\NSFC\181111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the behavior of an SFCL coil in DC systems under low impedance and high impedance fault conditions. It is found that the SFCL coil effectively limits the fault current level under low impedance fault conditions, but can only limit the fault current when it is much higher than the critical current of the coil under high impedance fault conditions.
DC system protection is more challenging than that for AC system due to the rapid rate of rise of the fault current and absence of natural current zero-crossing in DC systems. Superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) in DC systems is a promising technology to reduce the fault current level and the rate of rise of the fault current, and also SFCLs have no resistance during normal operation. In this paper, the behaviors of an SFCL coil are investigated under both low impedance and high impedance fault conditions in DC systems. In the low impedance fault condition system, the SFCL coil performs effective limitation of the fault current level under different prospective fault current levels. The application of SFCLs with limited inductance in the DC system can be a potential solution to effectively suppress the fault current under low impedance short-circuit faults. The SFCL coil under the high impedance fault condition can only limit the prospective fault current when it is much higher than the critical current of the coil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据