4.8 Article

An expanded halogen bonding scale using astatine

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 32, 页码 10855-10861

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sc02133h

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Agency for Research called 'Investissements d'Avenir', Equipex Arronax-Plus [ANR-11-EQPX-0004]
  2. French National Agency for Research called 'Investissements d'Avenir', Labex IRON [ANR-11-LABX-18-01]
  3. French National Agency for Research called 'Investissements d'Avenir', ISITE NExT [ANR-16-IDEX-0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Halogen bonding is recognized as a valuable non-covalent interaction in various fields for intermolecular recognition control. The pK(BAtI) basicity scale quantifies the halogen bonding strength of astatine as the most potent halogen-bond donor element, with sulphur bases showing the highest AtI basicity. The scale can be used to enhance binding of carrier agents for targeted radionuclide therapy using At-211.
As a non-covalent interaction, halogen bonding is now acknowledged to be useful in all fields where the control of intermolecular recognition plays a pivotal role. Halogen-bond basicity scales allow quantification of the halogen bonding of referential donors with organic functional groups from a thermodynamic point of view. Herein we present the pK(BAtI) basicity scale to provide the community an overview of halogen-bond acceptor strength towards astatine, the most potent halogen-bond donor element. This experimental scale is erected on the basis of complexation constants measured between astatine monoiodide (AtI) and sixteen selected Lewis bases. It spans over 6 log units and culminates with a value of 5.69 +/- 0.32 for N,N,N ',N '-tetramethylthiourea. On this scale, the carbon pi-bases are the weakest acceptors, the oxygen derivatives cover almost two-thirds of the scale, and sulphur bases exhibit the highest AtI basicity. Regarding the applications of At-211 in targeted radionuclide therapy, stronger labelling of carrier agents could be envisaged on the basis of the pK(BAtI) scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据