4.7 Article

Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo's third observing run

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.022004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF 's LIGO Laboratory - National Science Foundation
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) of the United Kingdom
  3. Max-Planck-Society (MPS)
  4. State of Niedersachsen/Germany
  5. Australian Research Council
  6. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  7. French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  8. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  9. EGO consortium
  10. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of India
  11. Department of Science and Technology, India
  12. ScienceAMP
  13. Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  14. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India
  15. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion
  16. Vicepresidencia i Conselleria d'Innovacio, Recerca i Turisme
  17. Conselleria d'Educacio i Universitat del Govern de les Illes Balears
  18. Conselleria d'Innovacio, Universitats, Ciencia i Societat Digital de la Generalitat Valenciana
  19. National Science Centre of Poland
  20. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)
  21. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  22. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  23. Russian Science Foundation
  24. European Commission
  25. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF)
  26. Royal Society
  27. Scottish Funding Council
  28. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  29. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  30. French Lyon Institute of Origins (LIO)
  31. Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS), Actions de Recherche Concertees (ARC)
  32. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (FWO), Belgium
  33. Paris Ile-de-France Region
  34. National Research, Development and Innovation Office Hungary (NKFIH)
  35. National Research Foundation of Korea
  36. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada
  37. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  38. Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology
  39. International Center for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research (ICTP-SAIFR)
  40. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  41. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  42. Leverhulme Trust
  43. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan
  44. United States Department of Energy
  45. Kavli Foundation
  46. NSF
  47. STFC
  48. CNRS
  49. MEXT
  50. JSPS Leading-edge Research Infrastructure Program
  51. JSPS [20A203: JP20H05854]
  52. JSPS Core-to-Core Program A. Advanced Research Networks
  53. National Research Foundation (NRF) and Computing Infrastructure Project of KISTI-GSDC in Korea
  54. AS Grid Center (ASGC)
  55. Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) in Taiwan [AS-CDA-105-M06]
  56. STFC [ST/V001396/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the results of a search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background using data from advanced detectors, placing upper limits on the strength of different types of gravitational-wave backgrounds. The study also explores the potential sources of correlated noise and compares the results to a fiducial model for the gravitational-wave background. Additionally, the study demonstrates the potential of combining results from individual mergers to provide stronger constraints on the merger rate of binary black holes.
We report results of a search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background (GWB) using data from Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's third observing run (O3) combined with upper limits from the earlier O1 and O2 runs. Unlike in previous observing runs in the advanced detector era, we include Virgo in the search for the GWB. The results of the search are consistent with uncorrelated noise, and therefore we place upper limits on the strength of the GWB. We find that the dimensionless energy density Omega(GW) <= 5.8 x 10(-9) at the 95% credible level for a flat (frequency-independent) GWB, using a prior which is uniform in the log of the strength of the GWB, with 99% of the sensitivity coming from the band 20-76.6 Hz; Omega(GW)(f) <= 3.4 x 10(-9) at 25 Hz for a power-law GWB with a spectral index of 2/3 (consistent with expectations for compact binary coalescences), in the band 20-90.6 Hz; and Omega(GW)(f) <= 3.9 x 10(-10) at 25 Hz for a spectral index of 3, in the band 20-291.6 Hz. These upper limits improve over our previous results by a factor of 6.0 for a flat GWB, 8.8 for a spectral index of 2/3, and 13.1 for a spectral index of 3. We also search for a GWB arising from scalar and vector modes, which are predicted by alternative theories of gravity; we do not find evidence of these, and place upper limits on the strength of GWBs with these polarizations. We demonstrate that there is no evidence of correlated noise of magnetic origin by performing a Bayesian analysis that allows for the presence of both a GWB and an effective magnetic background arising from geophysical Schumann resonances. We compare our upper limits to a fiducial model for the GWB from the merger of compact binaries, updating the model to use the most recent data-driven population inference from the systems detected during O3a. Finally, we combine our results with observations of individual mergers and show that, at design sensitivity, this joint approach may yield stronger constraints on the merger rate of binary black holes at z greater than or similar to 2 than can be achieved with individually resolved mergers alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据