4.7 Article

Peculiarities of crystallization in the multiblock copolymers of norbornene and cyclooctene

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 143-153

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.11.025

关键词

Multiblock copolymers; Crystallinity; Degree of blockiness; Thermal fractionation; DSC

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-03-00665]
  2. RF [MK-7525.2015.3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crystallinity of statistical multiblock copolymers of norbornene and cyclooctene with nearly equimolar composition and different degrees of blockiness is studied by differential scanning calorimetry including thermal fractionation by successive self-nucleation and annealing and by X-ray diffraction. The copolymers are synthesized via recently invented reaction of polymer cross-metathesis, as a result of interchain exchange between polynorbomene and polyoctenamer in the presence of Grubbs' catalyst of the first generation. This catalyst raises the fraction of trans-octenylene units up to more than 80% promoting formation of triclinic crystals. The copolymer degree of crystallinity and melting peak temperature decrease with the cross-metathesis conversion. At the same time the equilibrium melting temperature predicted by the Flory theory of copolymer crystallization is not much affected by the interchange reaction. Compared with the pure polyoctenamer or its equimolar blend with polynorbornene, the norborene-cyclooctene copolymers form considerably smaller crystallites. Thermal fractionation makes it possible to find their size distribution, which correlates with the average length of trans-octenylene blocks. Short annealing the multiblock copolymers above their melting points gives rise to a small but persistent endotherm 5-10 degrees above the annealing temperature, which is absent in polyoctenamer and, therefore, may indicate mixing of segregated norbornene and cyclooctene blocks. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据