3.9 Article

Gender, Populism, and the QAnon Conspiracy Movement

期刊

FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.615727

关键词

populism; gender; conspiracy; Trumpism; Andrea Dworkin; femininity; QAnon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The essay argues that scholarly reflection on the relationship of gender and populism should not only focus on the role of men, but also pay attention to the use of femininity in populism. Through an examination of the mobilization of femininity, particularly centered on motherhood, in the QAnon movement, it demonstrates how women can be engaged in populist political projects through feminine identities.
According to one recent review of the burgeoning interdisciplinary scholarly literature on populism, populism's relationship with gender issues remains largely understudied (Abi-Hassan, 2017, 426-427). Of those scholarly treatments that do exist, the lion's share focus on the role of men and masculinity in populist movements. In this essay, I argue scholarly reflection on the relationship of gender and populism should not be limited to this narrow frame. Through a close examination of the complex gender politics of QAnon, a pro-Trump conspiracy movement that burst into the mainstream of U.S. politics and culture with the onset of the global Coronavirus pandemic, I demonstrate that populist deployments of femininity are as rich, complex, and potent as their deployments of masculinity. QAnon, I argue, is a case study in how femininity, particularly feminine identities centered on motherhood and maternal duty, can be mobilized to engage women in populist political projects. Until scholars of populism start asking Cynthia Enloe's famous question, Where are the women?, in a sustained and rigorous way, phenomena that are integral to populism's functioning will elude us and our understanding of the relationship between gender and populism will remain partial and incomplete (Enloe, 2014).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据