4.0 Article

Hierarchization of Zeolites A and X Using Bacterial Cellulose as

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 1822-1831

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.21577/0103-5053.20210073

关键词

zeolite; bacterial cellulose; hierarchization

资金

  1. FUNCAP/CNPq [PR2-0101-00023.01.00/15]
  2. CAPES [2017SLR-17925]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brazil (CAPES) [001, 88881.189392/2018-01]
  4. Central Analitica-UFC/CT-INFRA/MCTI-SISANO/Pro-Equipamentos CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical porous cartridges were formed by impregnating bacterial cellulose with zeolites A and X. The oxidation step for cellulose was found to be crucial for hierarchization and showed a positive effect on the cartridges. These components can be successfully mixed for potential use in gas and liquid adsorption technologies.
In this work, we studied the formation of hierarchical porous cartridges by means of bacterial cellulose impregnation with the zeolites A and X. Cellulose was successfully produced by Komagataeibacter genus and the zeolites were obtained by hydrothermal route. The composites were formed using both oxidized and non-oxidized cellulose. Different characterization techniques were used to analyze the resulting materials like powder X-ray diffraction, spectroscopic techniques (infrared vibrational spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance), electron microscopy, thermal analyses, as well as ionic exchange experiments. The results show that the composites present layers with large voids among them, formed by cellulose nanofibrils tangling the particles in the oxidized samples, and shiftings in the bands referent to the carboxilyc groups and hydrogen bondings. The oxidation step for the cellulose seems to be important for the hierarchization and a positive effect on the cartridges is found for Ca2+ ionic exchange tests. Thus, these components can be successfully mixed to form cartridges with potential use at gas and liquid adsorption technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据