4.5 Article

Anthropogenic evolution in an insect wing polymorphism following widespread deforestation

期刊

BIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0069

关键词

rapid evolution; flight loss; Plecoptera; Zelandoperla

资金

  1. Marsden (Royal Society of New Zealand) [UOO1412, UOO2016]
  2. University of Otago Doctoral Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human-driven environmental changes, such as deforestation, can lead to shifts in the distribution of flight-capable and flightless phenotypes in stonefly populations, as seen in New Zealand through variations in alpine treeline elevation. Rapid shifts to flightlessness in newly deforested regions have significant implications for the evolution and conservation of invertebrate biodiversity.
Anthropogenic environmental change can underpin major shifts in natural selective regimes, and can thus alter the evolutionary trajectories of wild populations. However, little is known about the evolutionary impacts of deforestation-one of the most pervasive human-driven changes to terrestrial ecosystems globally. Absence of forest cover (i.e. exposure) has been suggested to play a role in selecting for insect flightlessness in montane ecosystems. Here, we capitalize on human-driven variation in alpine treeline elevation in New Zealand to test whether anthropogenic deforestation has caused shifts in the distributions of flight-capable and flightless phenotypes in a wing-polymorphic lineage of stoneflies from the Zelandoperla fenestrata species complex. Transect sampling revealed sharp transitions from flightcapable to flightless populations with increasing elevation. However, these phenotypic transitions were consistently delineated by the elevation of local treelines, rather than by absolute elevation, providing a novel example of human-driven evolution in response to recent deforestation. The inferred rapid shifts to flightlessness in newly deforested regions have implications for the evolution and conservation of invertebrate biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据