4.7 Article

Second-harmonic generation as a minimal model of turbulence

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 104, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014129

关键词

-

资金

  1. Simons foundation [662962]
  2. Russian Ministry of Science [075-15-2019-1893]
  3. EU Horizon 2020 programme [873028]
  4. ISF
  5. BSF
  6. Minerva
  7. NSF [DMS-1814619, ACI-1548562, DMS-140028]
  8. Scientific Excellence Center at WIS
  9. Ariane de Rothschild Women Doctoral Program at WIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When two resonantly interacting modes are in contact with a thermostat, their statistics is exactly Gaussian and the modes are statistically independent despite strong interaction. However, in cascades of noise-driven systems, the statistics is never close to Gaussian, whether interaction is strong or noise is weak. Surprisingly, the mutual information between modes increases and entropy decreases when interaction strength decreases.
When two resonantly interacting modes are in contact with a thermostat, their statistics is exactly Gaussian and the modes are statistically independent despite strong interaction. Considering a noise-driven system, we show that when one mode is pumped and another dissipates, the statistics of such cascades is never close to Gaussian, no matter what is the relation between interaction and noise. One finds substantial phase correlation in the limit of strong interaction or weak noise. Surprisingly, the mutual information between modes increases and entropy decreases when interaction strength decreases. We use the model to elucidate the fundamental problem of far-from equilibrium physics: where the information, or entropy deficit, is encoded, and how singular measures form. For an instability-driven system, such as laser, even a small added noise leads to large fluctuations of the relative phase near the stability threshold, while far from the equilibrium the conversion into the second harmonic is weakly affected by noise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据