3.8 Article

The use and effects of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists by New South Wales cannabis treatment clients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANNABIS RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s42238-021-00091-z

关键词

Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist; Synthetic cannabinoids; Cannabis; Marijuana; Substance use disorder; Treatment

资金

  1. New South Wales Health Drug and Alcohol Research Grants Program [H13/115985-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite decreasing overall consumption, synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) continue to be used by marginalized groups, especially those who use other substances. In an Australian study of cannabis treatment clients, it was found that SCRA use was relatively common but not preferred. SCRA users exhibited hazardous substance use and poor mental health, emphasizing the importance of ongoing monitoring by researchers and treatment providers.
Introduction Despite decreasing consumption by general populations, use of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) persists in some marginalised groups, including those who use other substances. This article explores SCRA consumption in an Australian cannabis treatment sample, comparing those who report ever using SCRAs with those who have never used SCRAs. Methods A questionnaire orally administered in person to a convenience sample of 154 cannabis treatment service clients from New South Wales, Australia (71% male, median age 35) collected information regarding cannabis and SCRA use including motivations, effects and health-related consequences of use, demographics, other substance use and overall health. Demographic profiles and between-group differences were explored. McNemar tests compared effects of SCRA and cannabis. Logistic regression analysis determined predictors of SCRA use. Results Half (53%) reported lifetime SCRA use; 20% reported previous-month use. The SCRA + cannabis group displayed greater polysubstance use and psychological distress. Reduced dependence on cannabis but higher levels of other substance use may predict SCRA use. Although curiosity motivated initial SCRA consumption, perceived psychoactive strength drove continued use. SCRAs appear to induce more negative side-effects than cannabis. Of the SCRA + cannabis group, 27% sought medical assistance for SCRA use. Most (90%) preferred cannabis to SCRAs, citing superior safety, effects and consistency of cannabis. Conclusions Among clients seeking treatment for cannabis use, SCRA use was relatively common, although not a preferred substance. Hazardous substance use and poor mental health characterised SCRA consumers, highlighting the need for continued monitoring by researchers and treatment providers of SCRA consumption in populations who use substances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据