4.6 Article

Fabrication of nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbons from Sargassum as advanced electrode materials for supercapacitors

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 34, 页码 15514-15524

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj02970c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876217]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel approach was developed to synthesize three-dimensional porous carbons as electrode materials for supercapacitors using Sargassum as the precursor, KOH activation, and nitrogen-doping with melamine. The resulting N-0.67@SAC exhibited high specific surface area, good rate capacity, and excellent cycling stability, with nitrogen-doping improving wettability and introducing pseudocapacitance.
Using Sargassum as the precursor, a novel approach was developed to synthesize three-dimensional porous carbons as high-performance electrode materials for supercapacitors via KOH activation and subsequent nitrogen-doping employing melamine as the dopant. Melamine was decomposed in the presence of KOH under high-temperature conditions, leading to the formation of a unique spiderweb-like carbon structure. At a proper nitrogen doping amount, the as-synthesized N-0.67@SAC showed a high specific surface area of 2928.78 m(2) g(-1) with a large proportion of micropores, and its nitrogen content reached 1.07%. When used as the electrode material in a symmetric two-electrode system, N-0.67@SAC exhibited a high gravimetric specific capacitance of 481 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1) with a good rate capacity of 85% at 10 A g(-1). Nitrogen-doping can effectively improve the wettability of the material, and the pseudocapacitance is introduced by the Faraday reaction. N-0.67@SAC also exhibited excellent cycling stability with a 100.7% retention rate after 10 000 cycles. Also, the N-0.67@SAC showed a high specific energy of 16.68 W h kg(-1) at a specific power of 628.9 W kg(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1) in the voltage range of 0-1 V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据