Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School

This study aimed to analyze gender, anxiety, and psychological inflexibility differences of high school students' behaviors in a simulated situation of peer coercion into academic cheating. Method: A total of 1147 volunteer adolescents participated, (Men: N = 479; Mage = 16.3; Women: N = 668; Mage = 16.2). The participants saw 15 s animated online video presenting peer coercion into an academic cheating situation, including a questionnaire about their reactions to face the situation. They also answered the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for children and adolescents and the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Gender was associated with the behaviors facing the situation. Higher state anxiety and inflexibility were present in those participants that avoided aggressive behaviors facing the situation; on the other hand, trait anxiety was present in those who reacted aggressively. Finally, higher anxiety and inflexibility were associated with the used moral disengagement mechanisms, but also with peers' perception as sanctioning or being against the participants' decision. The most aggressive students were more flexible and less stressed than those who tried to solve assertively. Expectations about peers seem to be relevant to the decision-making facing moral dilemmas and peer victimization.

Automated summary

This study showed that gender, anxiety levels, and psychological inflexibility have an impact on high school students' behaviors in a simulated situation of peer coercion into academic cheating. Participants who avoided aggressive behaviors exhibited higher levels of state anxiety and inflexibility, while those who reacted aggressively displayed trait anxiety. Additionally, higher anxiety and inflexibility were associated with the use of moral disengagement mechanisms.