4.2 Article

An empirical examination of open source software adoption in US public libraries

期刊

ELECTRONIC LIBRARY
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 695-712

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/EL-01-2021-0013

关键词

Public libraries; Open source software; Information technology adoption; Awareness; Attitude surveys

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined barriers and drivers to OSS adoption in US public libraries through an online survey, revealing that awareness is a key barrier for adoption. Practical implications were provided tailored for public libraries, emphasizing the importance of promoting OSS awareness in rural and town areas.
Purpose Similarly to Choi and Pruett (2019), which addressed open source software (OSS) adoption in the academic library context, this study aims to examine barriers and drivers to OSS adoption and to provide a snapshot of the current state of OSS adoption in US public libraries. Design/methodology/approach An online survey of the public library staff members who oversee information systems/technology in their library was conducted. A total number of 288 valid responses were used for data analysis. Findings A range of barriers and drivers to OSS adoption in US public libraries were revealed, but, unlike academic libraries, awareness was found to be a barrier. Additionally, the vast majority of the non-adopters showed very low levels of OSS adoption intent in the near future, more than that which was indicated by academic libraries. Practical implications Several practical implications tailored for public libraries are provided, such as promoting OSS awareness among public libraries in rural and town areas, the importance of the initial trial/adoption and funding and marketing towards public libraries with small service population sizes and so on. Originality/value Following Choi and Pruett (2019) which examined OSS adoption in the academic library context, this study conducted a similar online survey with US public libraries and made several contributions to the literature and to the public library field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据