4.6 Article

Association of dietary tomato intake with bladder cancer risk in a prospective cohort of 101,683 individuals with 12.5 years of follow-up

期刊

AGING-US
卷 13, 期 13, 页码 17629-17637

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC

关键词

tomato; lycopene; bladder cancer; cohort; PLCO

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LY20H160019]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81800588]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan [2018KY032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found no statistically significant association between dietary intake of raw tomatoes, tomato catsup, tomato salsa, tomato juice, or lycopene and the risk of bladder cancer, based on analysis of the PLCO study data over a 12.5-year follow-up period.
Previous studies have provided limited evidence for the effect of tomato intake on bladder cancer incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dietary tomato or lycopene consumption and bladder cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening study. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression model adjusting for confounders. After a median of 12.5 years of follow-up, 774 incident bladder cancer cases were identified. We found no statistically significant association between dietary intake of raw tomatoes and bladder cancer risk (Adjusted model: HRQ5 VS Q1 = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.95-1.52; P for trend = 0.243). Dietary intakes of tomato catsup, tomato salsa and tomato juice were also not associated with the risk of bladder cancer (all P for trend > 0.05). There was no statistically significant association between dietary consumption of lycopene and bladder cancer risk (Adjusted model: HRQ5 vs. Q1 = 1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.33; P for trend = 0.590). In summary, analysis of the PLCO study suggested that dietary consumption of tomato or lycopene was not associated with the risk of bladder cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据