4.6 Article

SEQUENTIAL QUADRATIC OPTIMIZATION FOR NONLINEAR EQUALITY CONSTRAINED STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION

期刊

SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 1352-1379

出版社

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/20M1354556

关键词

nonlinear optimization; stochastic optimization; sequential quadratic optimization

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [CCF-1740796]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sequential quadratic optimization algorithms are proposed to solve smooth nonlinear optimization problems with equality constraints, especially focusing on cases where constraint functions are deterministic. The algorithm uses a stepsize selection scheme based on Lipschitz constants for deterministic settings.
Sequential quadratic optimization algorithms are proposed for solving smooth nonlinear optimization problems with equality constraints. The main focus is an algorithm proposed for the case when the constraint functions are deterministic, and constraint function and derivative values can be computed explicitly, but the objective function is stochastic. It is assumed in this setting that it is intractable to compute objective function and derivative values explicitly, although one can compute stochastic function and gradient estimates. As a starting point for this stochastic setting, an algorithm is proposed for the deterministic setting that is modeled after a state-of-theart line-search SQP algorithm but uses a stepsize selection scheme based on Lipschitz constants (or adaptively estimated Lipschitz constants) in place of the line search. This sets the stage for the proposed algorithm for the stochastic setting, for which it is assumed that line searches would be intractable. Under reasonable assumptions, convergence (resp., convergence in expectation) from remote starting points is proved for the proposed deterministic (resp., stochastic) algorithm. The results of numerical experiments demonstrate the practical performance of our proposed techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据