4.7 Article

AHR mediates the aflatoxin B1 toxicity associated with hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00713-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1312100, 2020YFC2002705]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation Fund [81772490]
  3. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [2016-I2M-1-001, 2017-I2M-3-004, 2019-I2M-1-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) plays a crucial role in the toxicity of AFB1-associated HCC, and suggests that anti-PD-L1 therapy may be a therapeutic option for AFB1-related HCC.
Aflatoxin exposure is a crucial factor in promoting the development of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individuals infected with the hepatitis virus. However, the molecular pathways leading to its bioactivation and subsequent toxicity in hepatocytes have not been well-defined. Here, we carried out a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screen to identify aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) targets. Among the most significant hits was the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a ligand-binding transcription factor regulating cell metabolism, differentiation, and immunity. AHR-deficient cells tolerated high concentrations of AFB1, in which AFB1 adduct formation was significantly decreased. AFB1 triggered AHR nuclear translocation by directly binding to its N-terminus. Furthermore, AHR mediated the expression of P450 induced by AFB1. AHR expression was also elevated in primary tumor sections obtained from AFB1-HCC patients, which paralleled the upregulation of PD-L1, a clinically relevant immune regulator. Finally, anti-PD-L1 therapy exhibited greater efficacy in HCC xenografts derived from cells with ectopic expression of AHR. These results demonstrated that AHR was required for the AFB1 toxicity associated with HCC, and implicate the immunosuppressive regimen of anti-PD-L1 as a therapeutic option for the treatment of AFB1-associated HCCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据