4.7 Article

Supervised Deep Belief Network for Quality Prediction in Industrial Processes

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2020.3035464

关键词

Deep belief network (DBN); quality prediction; soft sensor; supervised DBN (SDBN); supervised restricted Boltzmann machines (BMs) (SRBMs)

资金

  1. Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61988101, 61703440, 61590921, 61621062]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1701100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2020zzts563]
  4. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate [CX20200309]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel supervised DBN (SDBN) is proposed in this article by introducing quality information into the training phase, ensuring learned features are largely quality-related for soft sensor modeling. The SDBN-based soft sensor model shows improved performance in quality prediction for industrial processes such as a debutanizer column and a hydrocracking process.
Deep belief network (DBN) has recently been applied for soft sensor modeling with its excellent feature representation capacity. However, DBN cannot guarantee that the extracted features are quality-related and beneficial for further quality prediction. To solve this problem, a novel supervised DBN (SDBN) is proposed in this article by introducing the quality information into the training phase. SDBN consists of multiple supervised restricted Boltzmann machines (SRBMs) with a stacked structure. In each SRBM, the quality variables are added to the visible layer for network pretraining and feature learning. Thus, the pretrained weights can act as better initializations for the whole network for fine-tuning. Moreover, it can ensure that the learned features are largely quality-related for soft sensor. Finally, the SDBN-based soft sensor model is applied to two industrial plants of a debutanizer column and a hydrocracking process for quality prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据