4.7 Article

Circular RNA Circ_0005564 promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal cells in osteoporosis

期刊

BIOENGINEERED
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 4911-4923

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1959865

关键词

Circ_0005564; osteogenic differentiation; BMSCs; high-throughput sequencing

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2018A030313694]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that circ_0005564 is a potential positive regulator of osteogenic differentiation in BMSCs, as knocking it down inhibited osteoblast differentiation and significantly reduced mRNA expression of RUNX2, OPN, and OCN.
Circular RNA (CircRNA) plays a potential role in bone formation. We aimed to study the circRNAs expression profiles and their functions in osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Firstly, we established osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs displaying increased mRNA expression of osteogenic differentiation marker (RUNX2, OPN, and OCN), increased ALP activity and protein expression, and increased mineralized nodules formation, as well as morphological alteration. Then, we employed high-throughput sequencing to analyze circRNA expression and found that 3440 and 3893 circRNAs in non-induced and induced groups, respectively. We further validated the 10 differentially expressed circRNAs with the most significant difference between induced and non-induced groups. Among these ten circRNAs, five of them with more than one miRNA binding site were used to construct a ceRNA network exhibiting 81 miRNAs and 182 target mRNAs. Furthermore, among these five circRNAs, we found only circ_0005564 significantly reduced the mRNA expression of RUNX2, OPN, and OCN. The circularity of circ_0005564 was verified. Our results showed that knockdown of circ_0005564 inhibited osteoblast differentiation in BMSCs. Taken together, our study demonstrates that circ_0005564 is a potential positive regulator of osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据