4.0 Article

Spray-induced gene silencing: an innovative strategy for plant trait improvement and disease control

期刊

出版社

BRAZILIAN SOC PLANT BREEDING
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332021v21Sa24

关键词

RNA interference; small RNAs; SIGS; dsRNAs

资金

  1. FORMAS [2018-01420, 2019-01316]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2019-04270]
  3. NKJ-SNS Dialogue Biocontrol network [NKJ-SNS 06]
  4. Carl Tryggers Stiftelse for Vetenskaplig Forskning [CTS 20:464]
  5. Crafoord foundation [20200818]
  6. Partnerskap Alnarp [1317/Trg, VO/2020, 1353/VO/2021]
  7. Alnarp stipendiekommittens
  8. Carl Tryggers foundation [19:82]
  9. Scottish Government Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS)
  10. Formas [2019-01316, 2018-01420] Funding Source: Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern plant breeding remains time-consuming and expensive, leading to a need for alternative methods. RNA interference technology, especially spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS), shows potential for controlling endogenous gene expression in plants or pathogens. SIGS has the added benefit of reducing pest impact and enhancing crop performance.
Modern plant breeding is still a time-consuming and costly process, even with the most advanced technologies such as gene editing. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop alternative means for plant trait manipulation and plant protection. RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved cellular mechanism mediated by naturally occurring double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and small RNAs (sRNAs) that can target mRNAs for destruction or transcript reduction. Here, we review the potential of technology based on RNAi, called spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS), as an alternative or adjunct to breeding for manipulation of endogenous gene expression in plants or pathogen control. SIGS based on exogenous application of RNA molecules in plants may be especially useful in reducing pest or pathogen impacts, thereby ameliorating biotic stresses and increasing the agronomic performance of crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据