4.5 Review

Triboelectric nanogenerator based on degradable materials

期刊

ECOMAT
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eom2.12072

关键词

bioelectronics; degradable materials; energy harvester; implantable; self-powered; triboelectric nanogenerator

资金

  1. National Youth Talent Support Program
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660410]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. National Key R&D Project from Minister of Science and Technology [2016YFA0202703, 2016YFC1102202]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61875015]
  6. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX20190026]
  7. 111 Project [B13003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of Triboelectric Nanogenerator (TENG) based on degradable materials promotes next-generation green energy technologies, which help avoid pollution and hazards caused by metal and hardly degradable plastic materials. In addition, biodegradable devices with healthcare functions are highlighted as promising solutions for future applications.
Green and eco-friendly energy technology are crucial to reduce environmental pollution caused by fossil fuels. Triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG), as an emergency green energy technology, which can get the energy from the surrounding environment and organism. The development of TENG based on degradable materials strongly promote the next-generation green energy technologies that will effectively avoid pollution and hazards caused by metal and hardly degradable plastic materials. In this review, we summarize the TENG based on degradable materials and its applications. The typical degradable materials for TENG are animal-based degradable material, plant-based degradable material, and artificial degradable material. We provide perspectives on the challenges and potential solutions associated with the next-generation degradable TENG. Beyond the material issue, we highlight the full biodegradable devices that show the healthcare function in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据