4.4 Article

Validity and reliability of the Moxy oxygen monitor during incremental cycling exercise

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 1037-1043

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1330899

关键词

Exercise; training; technology; physiology

资金

  1. Massey University Doctoral Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The Moxy is a novel, cutaneously placed muscle oxygen monitor which claims to measure local oxygen saturation (SmO2) and total haemoglobin (THb) using near-infrared spectroscopy. If shown to be reliable, its data storage and telemetric capability will be useful for assessing localised O-2 usage during field-based exercise. This study investigated the reliability of the Moxy during cycling and assessed the correlations between its measurements, whole-body O-2 consumption (VO2) and heart rate (HR). Methods: Ten highly trained cyclists performed an incremental, step-wise cycling protocol on two occasions while wearing the Moxy. SmO2, THb, VO2 and HR were recorded in the final minute of each five-minute stage. Data were analysed using Spearman's Order-Rank Coefficient (SROC), Intraclass Correlation (ICC), and Coefficient of Variance (COV). Significance was set at p.05. Results: SmO2 showed a strong' or very large' correlation between trials (SROC: r=0.842-0.993, ICC: r=0.773-0.992, p<01) and was moderately correlated with VO2 and HR (r=-0.71-0.73, p<01). SmO2 showed a moderate to high reliability at low intensities, but this decreased as relative exercise intensity increased. THb showed poor correlations between tests and with the other measured variables, but was highly reliable at all power outputs. Conclusions: The Moxy is a reliable device to measure SmO2 at low to moderate intensities, but at higher intensities, greater variation in measurements occurs, likely due to tissue ischaemia or increased movement artefacts due to more frequent muscular contractions. THb has low variation during exercise, and does not appear to be a valid indicator of muscle oxygenation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据