4.6 Review

Outcomes after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 108, 期 7, 页码 760-768

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab145

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1194410]
  2. National Breast Cancer Foundation Investigator Initiated Research Scheme grant [IIRS-20-011]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1194410] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The results showed that BCS was associated with lower rates of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and all-cause mortality compared to mastectomy. However, caution should be taken due to potential differences in patient selection for the two surgical options.
Background: In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), oncological and survival outcomes based on locoregional treatment are poorly understood. In particular, the safety of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for TNBC has been questioned. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) rates in patients with TNBC who had breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy. Estimates were pooled in random-effects analysis. The effect of study-level co-variables was assessed by univariable metaregression. Results: Fourteen studies, including 19 819 patients operated for TNBC met the inclusion criteria; 9828 patients (49.6 per cent) underwent BCS and 9991 (50.4 per cent) had a mastectomy. Patients with smaller tumours were more likely to be selected for BCS (pooled odds ratio (OR) for T1 tumours 1.95, 95 per cent c.i. 1.64 to 2.32; P<0.001). The pooled OR for LRR was 0.64 (0.48 to 0.85; P = 0.002), indicating a statistically significantly lower odds of LRR among women who had BCS relative to mastectomy. The pooled OR for DM was 0.70 (0.53 to 0.94; P = 0.02), indicating a lower odds of DM among women who had BCS; however, this difference diminished with increasing study-level age and follow-up time. A pooled hazard ratio of 0.78 (0.69 to 0.89; P<0.001) showed a significantly lower hazard for all-cause mortality among women undergoing BCS versus mastectomy. Conclusion: These results should be interpreted cautiously owing to likely differences in selection for BCS or mastectomy in the included studies. Patients with TNBC selected for BCS do not, however, have a worse prognosis than those treated with mastectomy, and breast conservation can be offered when feasible clinically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据